Line separator

RESEARCH STUDY

RESEARCH

Visual Risk Factors for Crash Involvement in Older Drivers With Cataracts

AUTHOR:

Cynthia Owsley

SPONSOR/INSTITUTION:

National Institutes of Health, Research to Prevent Blindness & the Eyesight Foundation of Alabama

YEAR PUBLISHED:

2011

PUBLICATION:

JAMA Ophthalmology

KEY HIGHLIGHTS:

KEY POINTS

  • Severe contrast sensitivity impairment due to cataract elevates at-fault crash risk among older drivers, even when present in only 1 eye.

SUMMARY

Background: The Impact of Cataracts on Mobility project has previously demonstrated that older drivers with cataract have an elevated risk of motor vehicle collision.


Objective: To examine what types of visual impairment serve as a basis of the increased crash risk of older drivers with cataract.


Results:  Logistic regression evaluated associations (odds ratios [ORs]) between visual function and crash involvement. Better and worse eye models defined on the basis of visual acuity were developed. Associations between each type of visual function and crash involvement were adjusted for age, sex, driving exposure, cognitive status, and other types of visual function.

For both the better and worse eye models, contrast sensitivity was independently associated with crash involvement, whereas visual acuity and disability glare were not. Drivers with a history of crash involvement were 8 times more likely to have a serious contrast sensitivity deficit in the worse eye (defined as a Pelli-Robson score of 1.25 or less) than those who were crash-free (OR = 7.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-39.79); this association was weaker for the better eye but still statistically significant (OR = 3.78; 95% CI, 1.15-12.48).

Crash-involved drivers were 6 times more likely to have severe contrast sensitivity impairment in both eyes (OR = 5.78; 95% CI, 1.87-17.86) than crash-free drivers. A severe contrast sensitivity deficit in only 1 eye was still significantly associated with crash involvement (OR = 2.70; 95% CI, 1.16-6.51).


Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(6):881-887. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.6.881.